Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers serve as the gatekeepers of quality and are therefore entrusted with the responsibility of evaluating the merit, accuracy, and relevance of submitted research papers. Your constructive feedback plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and academic excellence of this journal. Reviewers assist the editorial board in deciding whether a manuscript should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision to the author.

Each manuscript is assessed based on specific criteria outlined below. Reviewers are expected to familiarize themselves with our policies and adhere to them throughout the review process. The core responsibility is to provide an honest, unbiased, and ethical evaluation aligned with the standards upheld by Operations & Sustainable Logistics Management Journal.

Evaluation Criteria for Manuscripts

When reviewing a manuscript, consider the following aspects:

  • The research presents a unique perspective grounded in original and authentic ideas.
  • Arguments are clear, logical, and presented in a well-structured and coherent manner.
  • The content aligns with the journal's scope and is relevant to its target disciplines.
  • The manuscript is free from ambiguity and avoids vague or confusing statements that may distract readers.
  • The study offers valuable insights and contributes meaningfully to the existing body of knowledge.

Technical Assessment

In addition to the conceptual evaluation, reviewers should assess the following technical aspects:

  • The manuscript adheres to the journal's formatting and submission guidelines.
  • The topic is covered comprehensively and addressed all potential questions or concerns.
  • The writing demonstrates clarity, consistency, and coherence throughout.
  • Data and findings are accurate, relevant, and supported by appropriate citations.

Adherence to Ethical Standards for Reviewers

Reviewers must maintain the highest level of ethical conduct during the review process:

  • Do not accept a manuscript for review if it falls outside your area of expertise.
  • Report any violation of ethical standards or journal guidelines if noticed by you to the Editor-in-Chief immediately.
  • Provide constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement when applicable to enhance the impact of the research.
  • Treat all manuscripts as strictly confidential intellectual property. Do not share, reproduce, or disclose any content without the author's consent.
  • Never request that authors cite your own work, even if it appears relevant or recognized, unless it is essential for the research context.

Important Note to Reviewers

Reviewers will receive a certificate of acknowledgment for their valuable contribution to the journal's peer review process. This certificate can serve as professional recognition and may support future collaborations with academic and research institutions.