Submissions· Reviewer Guidelines
At the Operations & Sustainable Logistics Management Journal (OSLMJ), our reviewers play a vital role in ensuring the quality, credibility, and academic integrity of every article we publish. The peer review process forms the foundation of our editorial standards. It helps us maintain fairness, objectivity, and excellence in scholarly publishing.
We deeply value the time, effort, and expertise our reviewers contribute. The guidelines below are intended to help reviewers understand their responsibilities, uphold ethical standards, and deliver insightful evaluations that strengthen the scientific quality of each manuscript.
Core Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, honest, and impartial feedback that enhances the clarity, accuracy, and overall value of the submitted manuscript. Reviews should evaluate the originality, significance, methodology, and practical contribution of the research while identifying any weaknesses or areas for improvement. Every review should be framed with professionalism and respect toward the author's work.
Before Accepting a Review
Before agreeing to review, please ensure that the manuscript falls within your area of expertise and that you can complete the evaluation within the requested timeframe. If there is a potential conflict of interest, whether personal, financial, or academic, or if you feel unqualified to assess certain sections, kindly inform the editorial office immediately so we can assign another reviewer.
Confidentiality
All manuscripts are confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, discuss, or use any part of the manuscript before or after the review process. The double-blind review system ensures that both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous to each other, protecting objectivity and fairness at all stages.
Assessing the Manuscript
When evaluating submissions, reviewers should consider the following aspects:
- Relevance and originality of the research within the scope of OSLMJ.
- Soundness of methodology and the clarity of research design.
- Depth of analysis and reliability of data or models used.
- Contribution to the field, especially regarding sustainable operations, logistics innovation, and practical applicability.
- Quality of presentation, including logical flow, referencing, and adherence to academic writing standards.
Reviewers are encouraged to provide specific examples or recommendations to help authors strengthen their work.
Timeliness of Review
Timely reviews are essential to maintain an efficient editorial process. If, for any reason, a reviewer foresees a delay, they should notify the editorial office promptly. We deeply appreciate reviewers who respect deadlines, as it allows the journal to serve both the author community and readers more effectively.
Writing a Comprehensive Review Report
A good review balances critical evaluation with constructive suggestions. Comments should be structured, clear, and supported by reasoning or evidence where possible. Personal bias, unprofessional tone, or vague statements should be avoided. Reviewers should separate major issues (such as methodological flaws or conceptual weaknesses) from minor ones (like language or formatting concerns), making it easier for authors to revise their work meaningfully.
The Editorial Process
Once the reviews are submitted, the editorial team evaluates all reviewer reports collectively. The final publication decision, acceptance, revision, or rejection, rests with the editor, who considers the reviewer's insights and the paper's overall merit.
Handling Conflicting Reviews
In cases where reviewer opinions diverge significantly, the editor may seek an additional review or open a discussion among reviewers (while maintaining anonymity) to reach a fair and informed decision. Every effort is made to ensure that each manuscript receives a balanced evaluation.
Reviewer Recognition and Incentives
We recognize that peer review is a voluntary contribution to the scholarly community. OSLMJ acknowledges reviewers through annual recognition listings, certificates of appreciation, and opportunities to join the editorial board for consistent, high-quality contributions. Reviewers' dedication directly supports the advancement of research in operations and sustainable logistics.
A Final Note
Reviewing for OSLMJ is a responsibility that goes beyond assessing a paper. It's a partnership in shaping the global dialogue on sustainable operations and logistics management. We thank all our reviewers for their expertise, integrity, and continued commitment to helping authors and researchers deliver impactful, credible, and transformative research.
